Working with Online Proctoring
How EXAMIND works alongside online proctoring to protect remote-exam integrity.
Last updated
How EXAMIND works alongside online proctoring to protect remote-exam integrity.
Our perspective on online proctoring has evolved. Before modern AI, much of the conversation — and our own emphasis — focused on assessment design to reduce the motivation and reward for cheating, and was skeptical of proctoring's overhead and false positives.
Generative AI changed that calculus. When a student can get high-quality answers instantly, assessment design alone can't cover every threat. We now see online proctoring as a necessary complement to good design — not an alternative to it — for remote, high-stakes exams.
That said, proctoring should be targeted and proportionate, not blanket surveillance:
Apply it where it actually matters — especially where verifying identity and catching second-device use are the real risks.
Keep it proportionate to the stakes, and as invisible as possible to honest students — protection shouldn't add anxiety for students doing the right thing.
Design and proctoring solve different halves of the problem:
Assessment design reduces the payoff of cheating. Per-student dynamic variants make shared, leaked, or copied answers worthless in the first place.
Proctoring confirms the conditions of the exam. Its highest-value contributions are verifying who is taking the exam and catching the use of a second device — threats that assessment design can't see on its own.
Together they cover both the incentive to cheat and the opportunity.
EXAMIND is compatible with leading online proctoring tools. This isn't a deep, single-launch integration — it works because of how these tools operate: the proctoring service supervises the session, and students launch the EXAMIND assessment through it (a third-party LTI launch).
See Proctoring Integrations for setup details. (Interested in a deeper single-launch integration? Let us know.)
Last updated